Tiếng Việt English  
Home Our People Experiences Associations Contact us
Airbus Deutschland GmbH failed to prevent a Chinese company from diluting its global famed brand Airbus in China
(Ngày đăng: 2019-10-19)

Airbus Deutschland GmbH failed to prevent a Chinese company

from diluting its global famed brand Airbus in China[1]


Email: vinh@bross.vn


Senior Mark by Airbus


Junior Mark

by Shenyang Yongfeng Food Co.



Reg. No. 361935

Filing date: September 19, 1986

Registration date: September 20, 1989

Class 12: Aircraft and parts



App.No/Reg. No:

Filing date: July 24, 1998

Registration date: December 14, 1999

Class 30: biscuit, candy, chocolate, ice cream, among other things


Unlike the US, EU or Japan, China did not generate its own doctrine or theory on the protection of well-known trademark


China, a huge market and it is also probably the most attractive place where any famous brand name in the world want to enter and penetrate. With respect to the protection of well-known trademark, China is a country that does not focus on developing or generating its own theory or doctrine on protection of famous trademark. Instead, it basically absorbs and adopts in a way to comply with the international legal provisions available in the Paris Convention, the TRIPs Agreement and the WIPO joint Recommendation concerning the provisions on the protection of well-known marks.

Provisions on protection of well-known marks in China can be found in paragraph 2 of Article 13 of the 2001 Chinese Trademark Law stating that “where a trademark in respect of which the application for registration is filed fdr use for non-identical or dissimilar goods is a reproduction, imitation or translation of the well-known mark of another person that has been registered in China, misleads the pub1ic and is likely to create prejudice to the interests of the well-known mark registrant, it shall be rejected for registration and prohibited from use”.


As far as the conditions for recognizing a potential trademark as a famous trademark in China is concerned, upon the parties’ request, 5 required factors must consider before making a decision on whether the subject trademark is well-known or not, comprising:

(1) The degree of public recognition of the mark in its trading areas;

(2) how long the mark has been in use;

(3) the duration and extent of advertising and publicity of the mark, and the geographical extent of the trading areas in which the mark is used;

(4) the protection of the mark as a famous trademark;

(5) Other reasons for the fame of the trademark.


China’s position on protection of well-known marks viewered from the case Airbus


We can partly figure out the legal position on the protection of famous trademark in China through the case that Airbus Deutschland GmbH, the world's second largest manufacturer of civil aircraft[2], failed to prove its trademark AIRBUS is well known in China. Airbus Deutschland GmbH owns Chinese trademark registrations for the word AIRBUS for aircraft-related products and services whose filing dates go back around early September 1986.


In 1998, a Chinese company Shenyang Yongfeng Food Co. applied for registration of trademark "Airbus & Kongzhongkeche" (Kongzhongkech is a phonetic transcription of four Chinese words that were translated from AIRBUS) in class 30 including confectionery. Such trademark application was later approved by the Chinese Trademark Office (CTMO). Airbus Deutschland filed an objection but was rejected by the CTMO. The CTMO’s rejection decision after being complained to the CTMO’s higher authority agency by Airbus Deutschland was maintained the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (TRAB) because the TRAB argued that the Chinese company’s use and registration of trademark AIRBUS pertaining to candy does not confuse the public. Airbus Deutschland filed a lawsuit against the TRAB's decision before the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate Court contending that AIRBUS deserves to be protected as a well-known trademark under the Paris Convention, which shall extend to dissimilar goods or services.


However, the court dismissed Airbus Deutschland's arguments and declared to allow the preliminarily approved trademark AIRBUS under application no. 1343997 to move to the registration stage because the court found that Airbus Deutschland could not prove that its trademark AIRBUS became famous in China before the filing date of the opposed trademark prior to July 1998, although it is known that AIRBUS had been used in China before July 1998, the problem was that there was no evidence to substantiate this brand name was so widely known in China that it had become well-known until the filing date of the objected trademark. The court also asserted its point of view that when considering whether a trademark is well-known or not, attention should be paid to the reputation of the trademark by the time when the junior trademark was filed[3].

Bross & Partners has had experience in advising and successfully registered certification marks and collective marks in Vietnam. Should you have any query, please contact us at vinh@bross.vn or 84-903 287 057.


Bross & Partners, a renowned and qualified Patent, Design, Trademark and Copyright agent of Vietnam, constantly ranked and recommended by the Managing Intellectual Property (MIP), World Trademark Review (WTR), Legal 500 Asia Pacific, AsiaLaw Profiles, Asia IP and Asian Legal Business, is providing clients all over the world with the reliable, affordable contentious and non-contentious IP services including enforcement, anti-counterfeiting,  litigation regarding trademark, trade name, industrial design, patent, copyright and domain name.


[1] The article uses and/or extracts some contents from the research report under the “Project on protection of well-known trademark under Vietnamese law - Situation and Solution" co-authored by attorney Le Quang Vinh (a registered IP practitioner of Bross & Partners) and Dr. Phan Ngoc Tam (Ho Chi Minh City’s University of Law) sponsored by the INTA and Ministry of Science and Technology that was officially announced on November 17, 2017 in Hanoi and then published into a book by the Technical and Scientific Publishing House in 2017. See our published article in Vietnamese at the link: http://bross.vn/newsletter/ip-news-update/AIRBUS-khong-duoc-cong-nhan-la-nhan-hieu-noi-tieng-va-lap-truong-ve-bao-ho-nhan-hieu-noi-tieng-cua-Trung-Quoc-trong-vu-Airbus-Deutschland-GmbH-vs-Shenyang-Yongfeng-Food-Co


[3] See: Xem China Remark, IP Update Autum 2009, Mark & Clerk China or see: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bw/2009-10/12/content_8778075.htm


Bookmark and Share
Hợp đồng nhượng quyền thương mại và cách phân biệt hợp đồng nhượng quyền thương mại với hợp đồng li-xăng theo pháp luật Việt Nam
Franchise Contract and How to Distinguish a Franchise Agreement from an Intellectual Property Licence Agreement under the Vietnamese Laws
Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights by Criminal Measure under the laws of Vietnam
Standing, Conditions and Evidences in Support of Commencing an Action against an Infringment of Intellectual Property Rights before Vietnamese courts
Thực thi quyền quyền sở hữu trí tuệ bằng biện pháp hình sự theo pháp luật Việt Nam
Protection of Plant Varieties in Vietnam
Thực thi, bảo vệ quyền sở hữu trí tuệ ở Việt Nam bằng biện pháp hành chính
Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights by Administrative Measures in Vietnam
Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights in Vietnam and the Current Situation for Dealing therewith
Quyền khởi kiện, điều kiện khởi kiện và chứng cứ liên quan đến khởi kiện vụ án quyền sở hữu trí tuệ tại tòa án Việt Nam
Các dạng tranh chấp, hành vi xâm phạm quyền sở hữu trí tuệ có thể khởi kiện tại tòa án

Doing business in Vietnam
Intellectual Property in Vietnam
International Registrations
Copyright © Bross & Partners All rights reserved.

Cửa thép vân gỗcua thep van go