Tiếng Việt English  
Home Our People Experiences Associations Contact us
Vietnam to Guide How to Determine Bad Faith Trademark Filings
(Ngày đăng: 2023-12-13)

Vietnam to Guide How to Determine Bad Faith Trademark Filings

 

Attorney Le Quang Vinh – Bross & Partners

Email: vinh@bross.vn

 

Circular 23/2023/TT-BKHCN that was released and came into force from November 30, 2023 (“Circular 23”) guides the standards for determining “bad faith” (in Vietnamese: “dụng ý xấu”)[1] in the trademark opposition or trademark cancellation procedures.[2] Bross & Partners below summarizes this long-awaited guidance.

 

“Bad faith” is a new legal basis that is first time included in Article 117(1)(b) and Article 96 (1)(a) of the 2022 Intellectual Property Law (“IP Law”), whereby if there is a basis to believe that an  applicant had bad faith, VNIPO can apply these grounds to refuse protection of an applied-for trademark during the process of establishing rights or revoking validity of a registered trademark.

 

“Bad faith” is a legal basis independent of other grounds for refusal provided in the IP Law, namely: (1) the applied-for trademark does not meet the protection conditions (eg., it is descriptive, deceptive or conflicts with prior rights including registered trademarks, industrial designs, trade names, copyrights); or (2) the applicant does not have the right to register and has not been transferred the entitlement to register such trademark by the person who has the right to register.

 

In accordance with Article 34 of Circular 23, the applicant would be considered as acting “in bad faith" if the relevant evidence simultaneously satisfies both conditions:

  1. At the time of filing the application, the applicant knows or has a basis to know that the trademark he/she applied for is identical or similar to the extent that it is difficult to distinguish from other person’s trademark that is widely used in Vietnam or a famous in other countries, designated for identical or similar goods or services; and
  2. The applicant’s trademark registration is intended to take advantage of the reputation, goodwill of the other person’s trademark for profit, or mainly for the purpose of reselling, licensing or transferring registration rights to the other person whose trademark is widely used in Vietnam, or recognized as well-known trademark in other countries, or with the goal of preventing the other person from entering the market, or conducting other behaviors contrary to fair commercial practices.

 

Bross & Partners, an intellectual property firm ranked Tier 1 in 3 consecutive years 2021-2023 by Legal 500 Asia Pacific, has rich experience in trademark opposition and trademark cancellation in Vietnam.

 

Please contact: vinh@bross.vn ; mobile: 0903 287 057; Zalo: +84903287057; Skype: vinh.bross ; Wechat: Vinhbross2603.

 



[1] INTA's Resolution of 11 November 2020 states that “abusive filing and Bad Faith use of third-party trademarks may cause significant consumer confusion and damage to rights holders, undermine the purpose and function of trademark registration systems worldwide, and impact rights holders’ ability to protect and enforce legitimate trademark rights”. See more: BadFaithBoardResolutionNov2Clean_Final.pdf (inta.org)

[2] To understand the procedures for trademark opposition, third-party observation, and cancellation of a registered trademark under Vietnamese trademark legislation, see more: Trademark Opposition and Third-Party Observation against Applied-for Trademark under the IP Law 2022 - LexologyCancellation of registered trademarks in Vietnam and practical lessons - Lexology

 

Bookmark and Share
Relatednews
Xâm phạm nhãn hiệu trên vũ trụ ảo nhìn từ vụ Hermes vs. Mason Rothschild ở tòa án Hoa Kỳ
Thực tiễn giải quyết tranh chấp quyền tác giả ở Việt Nam, UK, Mỹ, EU và Trung Quốc
Cấp quyền nhân vật (merchandising rights) và các khía cạnh pháp lý cần lưu ý cho bên cấp quyền và bên nhận quyền
So sánh Đăng bạ chính (Principal Register) và Đăng bạ phụ (Supplemental Register) khi đăng ký nhãn hiệu ở USPTO
10 Key Changes in Enforcing Patent, Design, Trademark Rights via Administravive Measure under Revised Decree 99/2013/NĐ-CP
Qatar tham gia Hệ thống Madrid về đăng ký quốc tế nhãn hiệu
Thương hiệu giả mạo “Phở Thìn 13 Lò Đúc” bị hủy bỏ hiệu lực ở Hàn Quốc
10 thay đổi lớn về thực thi quyền sở hữu công nghiệp bằng biện pháp hành chính theo Nghị định 99/2013/NĐ-CP sửa đổi
Khi nào không thể hoặc không nên đăng ký thương hiệu ra nước ngoài theo Hệ thống Madrid?
ĐĂNG KÝ QUỐC TẾ NHÃN HIỆU THEO HỆ THỐNG MADRID
Cấm người khác dùng tên người nổi tiếng đăng ký nhãn hiệu ở Trung Quốc được không?

Newsletter
Guidelines
Doing business in Vietnam
Intellectual Property in Vietnam
International Registrations
Copyright © Bross & Partners All rights reserved.